
pow. augustowski
| Rada Powiatu Augustowskiego |
| Submitted candidates | ||||||
| Specification | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) | Status |
| Constituency no. 1 | 9 | 1 | 11,11% | 8 | 88,89% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 2 | 6 | 0 | 0,00% | 6 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 3 | 5 | 0 | 0,00% | 5 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 4 | 6 | 1 | 16,67% | 5 | 83,33% | Registered |
| Totalling | 26 | 2 | 7,69% | 24 | 92,31% | |
| Age of the candidates | |||||
| Specification | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men | Oldest | Youngest |
| Constituency no. 1 | 41 | 58 | 39 | 66 | 24 |
| Constituency no. 2 | 49 | - | 49 | 61 | 23 |
| Constituency no. 3 | 57 | - | 57 | 62 | 53 |
| Constituency no. 4 | 48 | 40 | 49 | 61 | 25 |
| The statistics of election committe |
| Lists submitted | ||
| Specification | Number of | |
| lists | councils | |
| Lists submitted for county councils | 4 | 1 |
| Lists registered for communal councils | 35 | 3 |
| Totalling | 39 | 4 |
| Submitted candidates | |||||
| Specification | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| Number of candidates submitted for county councils | 26 | 2 | 7,69% | 24 | 92.31% |
| Number of candidates registered for communal councils | 41 | 14 | 34,15% | 27 | 65.85% |
| Number of candidates submitted for reeve, mayor and presidential elections | 2 | 0 | 0,00% | 2 | 100.00% |
| Totalling | 69 | 16 | 23,19% | 53 | 76,81% |
| Average age of submitted candidates | |||
| Specification | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men |
| Average age of candidates submitted for county councils | 47 | 49 | 47 |
| Average age of candidates submitted for communal councils | 40 | 34 | 43 |
| Average age of candidates for reeve, mayor, president | 57 | - | 57 |
| Totalling | 43 | 35 | 45 |
| Submitted candidates for councils grouped by age | |||||
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| 18-29 | 16 | 4 | 25,00% | 12 | 75,00% |
| 30-39 | 13 | 8 | 61,54% | 5 | 38,46% |
| 40-59 | 29 | 4 | 13,79% | 25 | 86,21% |
| 60+ | 9 | 0 | 0,00% | 9 | 100,00% |
| Totalling | 67 | 16 | 23,88% | 51 | 76,12% |
| Submitted candidates for reeve, mayor, president grouped by age | |||||
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| 25-29 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 30-39 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 40-59 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% |
| 60+ | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% |
| Totalling | 2 | 0 | 0,00% | 2 | 100,00% |
| The youngest and oldest submitted candidate for councils | ||
| Age | Institution | |
| Youngest | 19 | Rada Miejska w Lipsku |
| Oldest | 70 | Rada Miejska w Lipsku |
| The youngest and oldest submitted candidate for reeve, mayor, president | ||
| Age | Institution | |
| Youngest | 53 | Burmistrz Lipska |
| Oldest | 62 | Wójt Gminy Augustów |
| Wójt Gminy Augustów |
| Number of | Family name and given names | Age | Education | Address, party membership and endorsements |
| 3 | Rukściński Władysław | 62 | wyższe | Augustów, submitted by KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORCÓW MAŁA OJCZYZNA AUGUSTOWSZCZYZNA, not a member of any political party |
| Rada Gminy Augustów |
| Submitted candidates | ||||||
| Specification | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) | Status |
| Constituency no. 1 | 2 | 0 | 0,00% | 2 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 3 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 4 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 6 | 2 | 1 | 50,00% | 1 | 50,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 7 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 8 | 2 | 0 | 0,00% | 2 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 9 | 2 | 1 | 50,00% | 1 | 50,00% | Registered |
| Totalling | 11 | 2 | 18,18% | 9 | 81,82% | |
| Age of the candidates | |||||
| Specification | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men | Oldest | Youngest |
| Constituency no. 1 | 32 | - | 32 | 37 | 26 |
| Constituency no. 3 | 41 | - | 41 | 41 | 41 |
| Constituency no. 4 | 29 | - | 29 | 29 | 29 |
| Constituency no. 6 | 41 | 35 | 47 | 47 | 35 |
| Constituency no. 7 | 25 | - | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Constituency no. 8 | 23 | - | 23 | 25 | 20 |
| Constituency no. 9 | 35 | 27 | 42 | 42 | 27 |
| The statistics of election committe |
| Lists submitted | ||
| Specification | Number of | |
| lists | councils | |
| Lists registered for communal councils | 7 | 1 |
| Totalling | 7 | 1 |
| Submitted candidates | |||||
| Specification | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| Number of candidates registered for communal councils | 11 | 2 | 18,18% | 9 | 81,82% |
| Number of candidates submitted for reeve, mayor and presidential elections | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% |
| Totalling | 12 | 2 | 16,67% | 10 | 83,33% |
| Average age of submitted candidates | |||
| Specification | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men |
| Average age of candidates submitted for communal councils | 32 | 31 | 32 |
| Average age of candidates for reeve, mayor, president | 62 | - | 62 |
| Totalling | 34 | 31 | 35 |
| Submitted candidates for councils grouped by age | |||||
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| 18-29 | 6 | 1 | 16,67% | 5 | 83,33% |
| 30-39 | 2 | 1 | 50,00% | 1 | 50,00% |
| 40-59 | 3 | 0 | 0,00% | 3 | 100,00% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| Totalling | 11 | 2 | 18,18% | 9 | 81,82% |
| Submitted candidates for reeve, mayor, president grouped by age | |||||
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| 25-29 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 30-39 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 40-59 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 60+ | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% |
| Totalling | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% |
| The youngest and oldest submitted candidate for councils | ||
| Age | Institution | |
| Youngest | 20 | Rada Gminy Augustów |
| Oldest | 47 | Rada Gminy Augustów |
| The youngest and oldest submitted candidate for reeve, mayor, president | ||
| Age | Institution | |
| Youngest | 62 | Wójt Gminy Augustów |
| Oldest | 62 | Wójt Gminy Augustów |
| Rada Gminy Sztabin |
| Submitted candidates | ||||||
| Specification | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) | Status |
| Constituency no. 1 | 3 | 2 | 66,67% | 1 | 33,33% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 2 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 3 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 4 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 5 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 6 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 7 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 8 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 9 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 10 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 11 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 12 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 13 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Totalling | 15 | 8 | 53,33% | 7 | 46,67% | |
| Age of the candidates | |||||
| Specification | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men | Oldest | Youngest |
| Constituency no. 1 | 35 | 30 | 47 | 47 | 27 |
| Constituency no. 2 | 43 | - | 43 | 43 | 43 |
| Constituency no. 3 | 36 | - | 36 | 36 | 36 |
| Constituency no. 4 | 51 | - | 51 | 51 | 51 |
| Constituency no. 5 | 33 | 33 | - | 33 | 33 |
| Constituency no. 6 | 50 | - | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Constituency no. 7 | 24 | 24 | - | 24 | 24 |
| Constituency no. 8 | 39 | 39 | - | 39 | 39 |
| Constituency no. 9 | 48 | - | 48 | 48 | 48 |
| Constituency no. 10 | 27 | - | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Constituency no. 11 | 42 | 42 | - | 42 | 42 |
| Constituency no. 12 | 33 | 33 | - | 33 | 33 |
| Constituency no. 13 | 38 | 38 | - | 38 | 38 |
| The statistics of election committe |
| Lists submitted | ||
| Specification | Number of | |
| lists | councils | |
| Lists registered for communal councils | 13 | 1 |
| Totalling | 13 | 1 |
| Submitted candidates | |||||
| Specification | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| Number of candidates registered for communal councils | 15 | 8 | 53,33% | 7 | 46,67% |
| Number of candidates submitted for reeve, mayor and presidential elections | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| Totalling | 15 | 8 | 53,33% | 7 | 46,67% |
| Average age of submitted candidates | |||
| Specification | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men |
| Average age of candidates submitted for communal councils | 38 | 34 | 43 |
| Average age of candidates for reeve, mayor, president | - | - | - |
| Totalling | 38 | 34 | 43 |
| Submitted candidates for councils grouped by age | |||||
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| 18-29 | 3 | 2 | 66,67% | 1 | 33,33% |
| 30-39 | 6 | 5 | 83,33% | 1 | 16,67% |
| 40-59 | 6 | 1 | 16,67% | 5 | 83,33% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| Totalling | 15 | 8 | 53,33% | 7 | 46,67% |
| Submitted candidates for reeve, mayor, president grouped by age | |||||
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| 25-29 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 30-39 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 40-59 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| Totalling | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| The youngest and oldest submitted candidate for councils | ||
| Age | Institution | |
| Youngest | 24 | Rada Gminy Sztabin |
| Oldest | 51 | Rada Gminy Sztabin |
| Burmistrz Lipska |
| Number of | Family name and given names | Age | Education | Address, party membership and endorsements |
| 2 | Gąsiewski Marek Leszek | 53 | wyższe | Augustów, submitted by KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORCÓW MAŁA OJCZYZNA AUGUSTOWSZCZYZNA, not a member of any political party |
| Rada Miejska w Lipsku |
| Submitted candidates | ||||||
| Specification | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) | Status |
| Constituency no. 1 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 2 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 3 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 4 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 5 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 6 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 7 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 8 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 9 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 10 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 11 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 12 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 13 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 14 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% | Registered |
| Constituency no. 15 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% | Registered |
| Totalling | 15 | 4 | 26,67% | 11 | 73,33% | |
| Age of the candidates | |||||
| Specification | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men | Oldest | Youngest |
| Constituency no. 1 | 57 | - | 57 | 57 | 57 |
| Constituency no. 2 | 70 | - | 70 | 70 | 70 |
| Constituency no. 3 | 53 | - | 53 | 53 | 53 |
| Constituency no. 4 | 33 | - | 33 | 33 | 33 |
| Constituency no. 5 | 40 | - | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Constituency no. 6 | 49 | - | 49 | 49 | 49 |
| Constituency no. 7 | 19 | 19 | - | 19 | 19 |
| Constituency no. 8 | 39 | 39 | - | 39 | 39 |
| Constituency no. 9 | 67 | - | 67 | 67 | 67 |
| Constituency no. 10 | 60 | - | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Constituency no. 11 | 33 | - | 33 | 33 | 33 |
| Constituency no. 12 | 56 | - | 56 | 56 | 56 |
| Constituency no. 13 | 33 | 33 | - | 33 | 33 |
| Constituency no. 14 | 53 | - | 53 | 53 | 53 |
| Constituency no. 15 | 52 | 52 | - | 52 | 52 |
| The statistics of election committe |
| Lists submitted | ||
| Specification | Number of | |
| lists | councils | |
| Lists registered for communal councils | 15 | 1 |
| Totalling | 15 | 1 |
| Submitted candidates | |||||
| Specification | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| Number of candidates registered for communal councils | 15 | 4 | 26,67% | 11 | 73,33% |
| Number of candidates submitted for reeve, mayor and presidential elections | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% |
| Totalling | 16 | 4 | 25,00% | 12 | 75,00% |
| Average age of submitted candidates | |||
| Specification | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men |
| Average age of candidates submitted for communal councils | 48 | 36 | 52 |
| Average age of candidates for reeve, mayor, president | 53 | - | 53 |
| Totalling | 48 | 36 | 52 |
| Submitted candidates for councils grouped by age | |||||
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| 18-29 | 1 | 1 | 100,00% | 0 | 0,00% |
| 30-39 | 4 | 2 | 50,00% | 2 | 50,00% |
| 40-59 | 7 | 1 | 14,29% | 6 | 85,71% |
| 60+ | 3 | 0 | 0,00% | 3 | 100,00% |
| Totalling | 15 | 4 | 26,67% | 11 | 73,33% |
| Submitted candidates for reeve, mayor, president grouped by age | |||||
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
| 25-29 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 30-39 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| 40-59 | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
| Totalling | 1 | 0 | 0,00% | 1 | 100,00% |
| The youngest and oldest submitted candidate for councils | ||
| Age | Institution | |
| Youngest | 19 | Rada Miejska w Lipsku |
| Oldest | 70 | Rada Miejska w Lipsku |
| The youngest and oldest submitted candidate for reeve, mayor, president | ||
| Age | Institution | |
| Youngest | 53 | Burmistrz Lipska |
| Oldest | 53 | Burmistrz Lipska |
